--found papers mailed to court on same day they were served, the day they were due,were late
by arriving one day later when the statute says papers must be filed within a reasonable time. A finding that things timely served and arriving/filed the next day were not timely is absurd.
--found that he would determine standing based on a preponderance of evidence when that has never been the standard in a foreclosure.
--repeatedly ignoring motions for judicial notice of a relevant fact when the statute requires the court to take judicial notice.
--denying motions to vacate without addressing reasons shown in motion.
--denying motion to vacate a decision because Plaintiff failed to serve papers on Defendant, because, according to the judge, he would do the same thing even if procedural due process were followed.